Chapter 4: Consensual Relationships Policy
Rutgers University professors are prohibited from having romantic relationships with graduate students in their departments — and all undergraduates — under a sweeping new policy created in response to concerns about sexual harassment on campus, school officials said. Under the new policy :. Couples who are currently in a relationship in violation of the new policy must apply to a university chancellor for an exemption within 30 days, campus officials said. Married couples — such as a professor in one department and a spouse taking undergraduate classes in another department — will also have to apply for exemptions. Those who violate the policy could, potentially, lose their jobs. But they are trying to protect students on a campus where professors, deans and other officials can hold a lot of power. It is unclear how many Rutgers faculty members and students are already in romantic relationships or how many might apply for an exemption under the new policy. Some of the students said they had difficulty reporting the alleged harassment because the professors had the power to derail their graduate studies or future careers. A NJ Advance Media investigation found Rutgers was not investigating some sexual misconduct complaints made against professors because of a little-known policy that said the school did not have to look into allegations that were more than two years old. Rutgers President Robert Barchi dropped the two-year rule within hours of the publication of the investigation on NJ.
What You Need to Know About Professor-Student Relationships
The University of Texas System institutions and the University of Texas System Administration shall adopt policies addressing consensual relationships. The policies shall comply in all substantive respects with a model developed by the Office of General Counsel, shall be published in the institutional Handbook of Operating Procedures, and shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:.
Such relationships are prohibited even if only a single event. If managing the conflict is not possible, the relationship is prohibited.
Faculty, staff and student employees are prohibited from engaging in effect and ended before the effective date of this policy (July 1, ), must be disclosed.
Brandeis University is committed to maintaining a fair and professional academic, work and athletic environment in which members of the faculty and staff carry out their responsibilities in a way that is both respectful to those over whom they have authority and conducive to the development of a just and flourishing academic community. A sexual or romantic relationship between a faculty or a staff member and a person with whom they have professional responsibility i.
With professional responsibility comes power. It is incumbent on faculty and staff members not to abuse, or seem to abuse, the power with which they are entrusted. In order to avoid potential conflicts of interest, favoritism, exploitation, harassment or breaches of professional standards, the university prohibits romantic or sexual relationships, even when consensual, where there is supervision, direction or control between the parties. This policy applies to all faculty and staff employees of Brandeis University.
I wonder if they are single? On the other hand, these pairings have led to healthy relationships—including marriages—even here at UVU. Ian Wilson, senior vice president of academic affairs. In class there are clear roles that shape how professors and students interact with one another.
Faculty-Student Consensual Relationship Policies. Consensual romantic relationships between undergraduate students and faculty are not necessarily common.
This policy also applies to any individual under contract or on assignment at the university. This policy does not apply to student employees. Nothing in this policy replaces university policies on prohibited discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. Nor does it replace other university policies that may be related to conduct or relationships covered by this policy. The provisions of this policy apply regardless of the gender or the sexual orientation of the parties involved.
The university is committed to creating learning environments and working relationships in which students, faculty, and staff trust and respect one another. RIT recognizes that consensual romantic or sexual relationships between certain individuals in an educational environment may compromise the fairness and objectivity of educational decisions and the discharge of professional duties.
Indeed, consensual romantic or sexual relationships that occur in the context of educating, supervising, evaluating or mentoring students can be disruptive to the educational environment, not only to those involved in the romantic or sexual relationship but also to people around them. If an employee has a concern as to whether a relationship falls under this policy, the employee may seek confidential guidance from the Ombuds Office.
UPPS No. It is the policy of Texas State University that employees with direct teaching, supervisory, advisory, or evaluative responsibility over other employees, students, or student employees recognize and respect the ethical and professional boundaries that must exist in such situations. While relationships between consenting adults are a personal matter, they can create potential conflicts in the workplace and in the educational setting.
Such relationships also have the potential for exploitation of an employee, student, or student employee and can possibly create professional or academic disadvantages for third parties. Consensual relationships between employees in positions of authority with their subordinates, including their students, are prohibited unless the person in the position of authority discloses the relationship immediately or as soon as possible. The subordinate person is also encouraged to disclose the relationship; however, disclosure by the subordinate person does not relieve the employee in the position of authority of the duty to report immediately.
The relationship between teacher and student is the foundation of the academic mission of the University. This relationship vests considerable trust in the.
This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears authority and accountability as a mentor, educator, and evaluator. The unequal institutional power inherent in this relationship heightens the vulnerability of the student and the potential for coercion. The pedagogical relationship between teacher and student must be protected from influences or activities that can interfere with learning and personal development.
Whenever a teacher is or in the future might reasonably become responsible for teaching, advising, or directly supervising a student, a sexual relationship between them is inappropriate and must be avoided. In addition to creating the potential for coercion, any such relationship jeopardizes the integrity of the educational process by creating a conflict of interest and may impair the learning environment for other students. Finally, such situations may expose the University and the teacher to liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination.
Therefore, teachers see below must avoid sexual relationships with students over whom they have or might reasonably expect to have direct pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities, regardless of whether the relationship is consensual. Conversely, teachers must not directly supervise any student with whom they have a sexual relationship. Undergraduate students are particularly vulnerable to the unequal institutional power inherent in the teacher-student relationship and the potential for coercion, because of their age and relative lack of maturity.
Therefore, no teacher shall have a sexual or amorous relationship with any undergraduate student, regardless of whether the teacher currently exercises or expects to have any pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities over that student. Teachers or students with questions about this policy are advised to consult with the University Title IX Coordinator, the Title IX coordinator of their school, the department chair, the appropriate dean, the Provost, or one of their designees.
Students or other members of the community may lodge a formal or informal complaint regarding an alleged violation of this policy with the University Title IX Coordinator, with the Title IX coordinator of their school, or with the University-Wide Committee on Sexual Misconduct. Violations of the above policies by a teacher will normally lead to disciplinary action.
Exceptions to any of these prohibitions will be considered by the Office of the Provost or the Office of Human Resources on a limited, case-by-base basis. In keeping with this University policy, if charges of sexual harassment are made, the existence of a consensual relationship in any of the contexts stated above shall not be a defense in any proceeding brought by the Office of Residence Life and Housing, Office of the Provost, or Office of Human Resources.
This policy is intended to be an addition to existing University rules and regulations and does not alter or modify any existing University rule or regulation. How do I change my HSA contribution?
Can a something college student date a something professor? and they’ll be spelled out in a big rulebook called the Faculty Handbook or something.
The debate around student-professor relationships was recently reopened in Canada in the wake of an alleged sexual assault of a former University of British Columbia UBC student by her professor, author and former UBC creative writing chair Steven Galloway. Galloway admitted to having an affair with the student, though he denied sexually assaulting her.
Since the issue began in , the student has called on UBC to ban relationships between students and professors. While many American universities such as Harvard University and Yale University have policies banning sexual relationships between professors and students, no Canadian university has a specific ban on student-professor relationships. According to the memorandum, instructors romantically involved with a student must disclose their relationship to the chair of their department.
However, Grondin believes that student-professor relationships should be banned. Get Involved! Advertise Events Around Campus Menu.
Former Student, Fair Game?
The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes only. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of situations in which this policy applies. These examples illustrate the application of this policy, which as stated in II
The Policy also states that faculty or staff employees may not supervise or evaluate students to whom they are related by blood, law, or marriage. Because the.
To address situations in which two persons have an apparently voluntary romantic or sexual relationship, but where a power differential exists because of their roles within the university, e. The University of Kansas has a tradition of commitment to providing an academic community environment that, without discrimination, fosters intellectual, professional and personal growth. Central to the preservation of this environment is the trust that should characterize all interactions among those working toward the common goal of the institution, namely, our students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff.
This trust is put at risk when members of the University community engage in consenting romantic or sexual relationships that involve persons of unequal power, for example, administrator and faculty, faculty and student, supervisor and employee. Because the University of Kansas strongly disapproves of consenting relationships where a professional power differential exists, this policy statement is being promulgated.
These principles also apply to administrators and supervisors in their relationships with students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff. Those who choose to ignore these standards will stand responsible for their actions and risk the loss of support of the University community. If an employee’s supervisor attempts to initiate a personal relationship, the employee may feel that the employee’s options are similarly limited. As a result, the degree of informed consent that exists within such a relationship is difficult to establish.
Should a charge of sexual harassment follow, a claim of mutual consent may be difficult to sustain. Similar proscription applies to administrators and supervisors in their relationships with students and employees over whom they have an evaluative role. A supervisor who is in a romantic or sexual relationship with another individual where an evaluative responsibility must be removed from personnel decisions concerning that individual, such as appointment, retention, promotion, discipline, tenure, or salary.
Universities Grapple with Student-Faculty Relationships
This policy covers all UW System employees, students, and affiliated individuals. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the employment and academic environment is free from real or perceived conflicts of interest when UW employees, students, and affiliated individuals, in positions of unequal power, are involved in consensual romantic or sexual relationships. Even where negative consequences to the participants do not result, such relationships create an environment charged with potential or perceived conflicts of interest and possible use of academic or supervisory leverage to maintain or promote the relationship.
Romantic or sexual relationships that the parties may view as consensual may still raise questions of favoritism, as well as of an exploitative abuse of trust and power.
Should a professor be allowed to date their students? media attention in and , UBC policy concerning faculty-student relationships.
When one partner to a consensual romantic, dating or sexual relationship holds a position of academic or professional authority with respect to the other partner in connection with their University roles, the potential may exist for favoritism, breach of trust, abuse of power, or conflicts of interest. Such situations may also raise questions concerning the consensual nature of the relationship.
The University prohibits consensual relationships between undergraduate students and faculty members, and between undergraduate students and employees in administrative or staff roles having broad authority over undergraduate students e. Violation of this policy may result in a range of remedial and disciplinary actions, including but not limited to mandatory training or counseling, reprimand, probation, suspension, loss of privileges, demotion, expulsion, dismissal or termination.
Nothing in this policy is intended to abridge the rights of faculty as outlined in the Washington University Policy on Academic Freedom, Responsibility, and Tenure. See Employment of Relatives policy and the Discrimination and Harassment policy. Washington University in St. Undergraduates The University prohibits consensual relationships between undergraduate students and faculty members, and between undergraduate students and employees in administrative or staff roles having broad authority over undergraduate students e.
Noncompliance with Policy Violation of this policy may result in a range of remedial and disciplinary actions, including but not limited to mandatory training or counseling, reprimand, probation, suspension, loss of privileges, demotion, expulsion, dismissal or termination.
Tulane University is currently monitoring the development of Tropical Storm Laura and Tropical Depression 14 with our weather partners. Close Search form Search. Consensual Relationships Policy.
Many Canadian universities have similar policies. The topic of consensual sexual relationships between students and faculty is a “hot button” topic. It elicits a lot of.
In some ways, sex between students and their professors is part of the mythology of academia. It turns up regularly in film and literature. The scenario typically involves a young female student seduced by her older and more knowledgeable teacher. Historically, male professors have considered a campus full of available young women a perk of academia.
Attitudes began to change in the s and s, with the rise of feminism and an increasing number of female scholars in academia. Real policy changes did not occur until the late s and s, when courts said schools could be held liable in sexual harassment cases. Since then, many universities have begun to address student-professor dating.